Azure Migration Services — Program, Funding & Coverage
Migrating to Azure without a structured approach leads to budget overruns, extended timelines, and environments that cost more than the infrastructure they replaced. Opsio's Azure migration services provide end-to-end support — from assessment and landing zone design through execution and post-migration optimisation — ensuring your workloads arrive on Azure secure, performant, and cost-effective.
Trusted by 100+ organisations across 6 countries
200+
Workloads Migrated
35%
Avg Cost Savings
0
Downtime Events
99.9%
Post-Migration Uptime
Part of Cloud Solutions
Migrate to Azure With Zero Downtime
This page is the umbrella view of Opsio's Azure migration practice — the program, funding, and coverage map across every workload type, source platform, and Microsoft funding programme we operate under. If you are evaluating Opsio for a multi-wave, multi-workload Azure migration programme, this is the right starting point. For the four-phase delivery methodology and tooling deep-dive — Assess, Design, Execute, Optimise — see the sibling page at Azure migration service; that page is the methodology counterpart, and the two are deliberately published as a paired set rather than a duplicate. The plural page (this one) answers 'what does Opsio's full Azure migration capability cover and how is it funded?'; the singular page answers 'how does Opsio actually execute a migration, wave by wave?'. The program covers the full breadth of Azure migration paths: VMware-on-Azure via Azure VMware Solution (AVS) for customers preserving vSphere operational patterns; Hyper-V to Azure VMs using Azure Migrate Server Migration; physical-server migration via the Azure Mobility Service agent; SQL Server lift to Azure VM, replatform to Azure SQL Managed Instance, or refactor to Azure SQL Database depending on application compatibility; mainframe and midrange modernisation through partner-led approaches (Astadia, LzLabs, Micro Focus) sequenced into Azure; and SAP on Azure (S/4HANA, ECC) including HANA-certified VM sizing and Azure Centre for SAP solutions integration. We also operate cross-cloud AWS-to-Azure migrations, drawing on the comparative analysis in our AWS-to-Azure migration playbook and the broader funding-mechanism comparison in our MAP vs Azure Migration Program brief.
Funding and incentive alignment is a programme-level concern, not a per-workload one, which is why it lives on this umbrella page rather than on the methodology sibling. We engage Microsoft funding programmes including the Azure Migration and Modernisation Program (AMMP), Microsoft FastTrack for Azure for eligible architectures, and the partner-led Solutions Assessment programme for pre-migration discovery. Funding tracks differ by workload type — SAP on Azure has its own commercial track, SQL Server modernisation has dedicated incentives, and Windows Server and SQL Server end-of-support workloads qualify for Extended Security Update credits when migrated to Azure. Opsio handles eligibility evaluation, application paperwork, and Microsoft co-sell engagement directly so funding lands on time and reduces your committed AMC.
Wave planning and migration factory cadence are how the program scales beyond a single workload. Once the landing zone is built — see Azure managed services for the steady-state operations of that landing zone — we sequence workload waves of 5-25 servers depending on dependency complexity, with each wave running on a two-to-three-week cadence: assessment, replatform code prep, replication, test cutover, production cutover, hyper-care. For enterprises with 50-200+ workloads, this factory cadence is the difference between a migration that completes in 4-9 months and one that drifts into perpetual partial-migration. Coverage extends to regulatory and data-residency obligations: Sweden Central, Germany West Central, France Central, and UK South are the typical primary regions for European customers under NIS2, DORA, GDPR, and Swedish data-residency regimes, with Microsoft-defined region pairs used for the disaster-recovery posture established under Azure DRaaS. Our certified Azure architects have shipped 200+ workloads across financial services, healthcare, manufacturing, and technology — and every wave includes security hardening, compliance validation, and performance testing before production cutover. Featured reading from our knowledge base: AWS Migration Acceleration Program (MAP) Explained: Funding, Phases, and What Actually Gets Approved, How Opsio Streamlines Success with the AWS Migration Acceleration Program (MAP), and AWS MAP vs Azure Migration Program: Which Cloud Incentive Is Right for You.
How Opsio Compares
| Migration program capability | In-house migration team | Generic Azure partner | Opsio Azure migration program |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coverage of workload types | Strong on a few; gaps on SAP, mainframe, VMware, SQL modernisation | Lift-and-shift focus; modernisation and refactor capacity limited | VMware/AVS, Hyper-V, physical, SQL Server (lift/replatform/refactor), SAP on Azure, mainframe via partners |
| Microsoft funding programmes | Funding rarely pursued; eligibility unknown | Funding discussed but paperwork not handled | AMMP, FastTrack, ESU credits, Solutions Assessment — eligibility, application, and Microsoft co-sell handled end-to-end |
| AWS-to-Azure migration | Treated as a from-scratch Azure project; AWS knowledge lost | Often refused or scoped as two separate engagements | Cross-cloud playbook with AWS-side decommissioning sequenced into Azure landing-zone deployment |
| Wave planning and factory cadence | First wave succeeds; subsequent waves slip due to bandwidth | One wave at a time; no parallel execution | 5-25 servers per wave on 2-3 week cadence with parallel waves where dependencies allow |
| Data residency and regulatory fit | Sweden Central or local region adopted; documentation thin | Region chosen by default; residency mapped after the fact | Region pair selected against NIS2/DORA/GDPR/Schrems II constraints, documented in landing-zone code |
| Landing zone and IaC artefact | Built once; drift over time; modules not reusable | Subscription-only setup; management groups and SCPs missing | Enterprise-scale landing zone with management groups, Azure Policy, SCPs, hub-and-spoke networking as Terraform/Bicep |
| Post-migration optimisation included | Skipped due to migration fatigue | Separate engagement; rarely scheduled | Right-sizing, RI/SP modelling, Defender posture review built into wave-exit checklists |
Service Deliverables
Migration Assessment
Azure Migrate-driven discovery of servers, databases, applications, and dependencies. TCO analysis, migration complexity scoring, and wave planning for phased execution. Compliance gap analysis for regulated workloads.
Landing Zone Architecture
Enterprise-scale landing zones using management groups, subscriptions, and Azure Policy. Hub-and-spoke networking, Azure Firewall, Private Link, Azure AD integration, and compliance guardrails deployed via Terraform.
Server Migration
Azure Migrate for VMware, Hyper-V, and physical server migration with continuous replication and minimal cutover downtime. Re-platforming to Azure App Service or AKS for suitable workloads.
Database Migration
Azure Database Migration Service for SQL Server, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and Oracle migrations. Schema assessment, compatibility testing, continuous replication, and validated cutover with near-zero downtime.
Post-Migration Optimisation
Right-sizing with Azure Advisor, Reserved Instance and Savings Plan implementation, monitoring configuration with Azure Monitor, and security posture validation with Defender for Cloud.
Ready to get started?
Get Your Free Migration AssessmentAzure Migration Services — Program, Funding & Coverage
Free consultation