Expert Guidance on Migration of an On-Premise Application to the Cloud
August 23, 2025|5:35 PM
Unlock Your Digital Potential
Whether it’s IT operations, cloud migration, or AI-driven innovation – let’s explore how we can support your success.
August 23, 2025|5:35 PM
Whether it’s IT operations, cloud migration, or AI-driven innovation – let’s explore how we can support your success.
How can your team capture real business value while avoiding downtime, data loss, and ballooning costs?
We frame a practical approach that links your goals with a clear technical roadmap, balancing speed and risk so leaders can act with confidence.
Cloud migration is more than lifting workloads; it is a staged program that protects data, sets security guardrails, and delivers measurable benefits.
We outline options to move cloud—rehost, replatform, refactor, or replace—and map each path to time-to-value and risk tolerance.
Our focus is governance and continuity from day one, using discovery tools, replication utilities, and vendor accelerators to compress timelines while preserving resilience in cloud infrastructure.
With stakeholders aligned, KPIs for OPEX and performance keep decisions anchored and show value at each phase.
We treat this shift as a business modernization program that replaces fixed servers and long refresh cycles with elastic services and managed stacks. Nearly half of organizations are cloud-native or fully enabled, and many others are actively moving legacy systems in waves to reduce risk.
Cloud platforms cut CAPEX, lower real estate and power costs, and let teams scale horizontally and vertically in minutes rather than months.
That scale drives real outcomes: faster feature delivery, lower latency for customers, and access to advanced analytics and AI from a leading service provider.
We emphasize clear KPIs, disciplined migration process execution, and mapped responsibilities across teams and service providers so cost, compliance, and performance stay aligned with business goals.
We start with a proven planning framework that ties business outcomes to technical choices. A short discovery phase should define percent OPEX and TCO reduction targets, expected duration, and the cost of change.
We set measurable goals—OPEX, TCO, performance baselines, and migration cost—then create application-level KPIs as baselines. This gives clear acceptance criteria for cutover and optimization.
Inventory hardware, software, source code, third-party licenses, security vaults, and every data store. Classify dependencies so sequencing and risk controls are clear.
Compare cloud providers by compliance, SLA strength, legal terms, and cost models. Draft a target environment—hybrid, multi-cloud, or single provider—and map workloads to the chosen deployment model.
Our proven tactics map each workload to a practical path that balances speed, risk, and cost. We present four primary approaches, plus complementary paths for physical and virtual starting points.
Rehosting moves applications to cloud infrastructure with minimal architectural changes, making it the fastest route when time-to-value matters. This approach stabilizes costs quickly and reduces operational risk while keeping existing data flows intact.
Replatforming makes selective changes, such as adopting managed databases or container runtimes, to improve performance and operational simplicity without a full rewrite.
Refactoring re-architects software toward microservices or serverless patterns, unlocking autoscaling and finer cost control but requiring additional design, security, and routing work.
Replacing swaps legacy systems for SaaS or PaaS when managed services deliver superior capability, provided functional parity and careful data migration checks are in place.
Complementary types—P2V, P2C, V2V, V2C—let teams preserve configurations and speed verification. We document the chosen migration strategy, map dependencies, and use discovery and replication tools with performance checkpoints so improvements are measurable.
We organize a clear, seven-step execution model so teams can move workloads with controlled risk and measurable outcomes.
First, we assign a migration architect and governance model to establish ownership, decision authority, and sequencing. This single point of accountability speeds approvals and keeps risk visible.
We score each workload for criticality and pick shallow or deep integration based on desired speed and long-term value. Then we select a public, private, hybrid, or multi-cloud environment that matches compliance, latency, and systems needs.
We set performance baselines and post-migration KPIs—throughput, latency, error rates, and cost per transaction—so gains are clear.
Workload-level plans cover data migration, compute and storage moves, hosting and configuration standards, network and security hardening, traffic transition, explicit rollback steps, and test scripts.
We pilot low-criticality workloads first, capture learnings, refine runbooks, then phase production cutover by domain or region to reduce customer impact.
We document every step, measure results, and fold changes into a living playbook so subsequent waves run faster and with lower risks to your business and customers.
We centralize discovery, automate replication, and validate transfers with proven toolsets that cut manual work and reduce downtime. Using platform tools gives clear telemetry and repeatable steps for each phase.
AWS toolset: we use Migration Hub for centralized tracking, Server Migration Service to automate workload moves, and CloudEndure for rapid lift-and-shift replication with a trial window that accelerates cutover while preserving data integrity.
Microsoft Azure Migrate: this service combines discovery, assessment, and readiness scoring for servers, databases, and applications, producing right-sized recommendations that help control cost and keep performance steady.
Google Storage Transfer Service: we rely on it for large-scale data migration from on-prem sources, optimizing throughput and validating checksums so transfers complete with accuracy at scale.
We outline a clear cost plan that prevents surprises while preserving agility and scalability. Our approach ties financial targets to architecture choices and operational runbooks, so leaders can see trade-offs before any cutover.
We build a TCO model that compares upfront hardware and real estate savings with ongoing operating costs, licenses, and migration line items. This model includes operations, support, and expected savings from deferred hardware refresh cycles.
Pay-as-you-go adds flexibility but can inflate bills during spikes. We recommend guardrails—budgets, alerts, quotas, and spending policies—so growth is not penalized by surprise charges.
We pair right-sizing and autoscaling with reserved commitments where it makes sense, balancing flexibility and discount programs from your provider. Ongoing monitoring, SLAs, and SLOs guide tuning so performance and costs stay aligned with business goals.
For a practical checklist and deeper financial guidance, see our recommended reading on cost considerations.
We design governance and controls so teams can move fast without exposing critical systems or breaking audits. Strong, repeatable controls protect data, reduce risks, and keep business stakeholders informed as work proceeds.
Cloud providers secure the underlying infrastructure and managed services, while we harden identities, data handling, network segmentation, and application configuration. Clear ownership of each control speeds approvals and reduces gaps.
We enforce encryption in transit and at rest, use immutable backups, and define disaster recovery with explicit RTOs and RPOs that match business tolerance. These steps make data restoration predictable and lower operational risks during migration.
We map regulations to technical controls and to processes, producing audit-ready evidence from day one. Continuous monitoring, alerting, and role-based access reduce insider threats while automated reporting supports compliance reviews and vendor assessments.
,
Success comes when we marry practical goals with disciplined execution, using provider tools and governance to reduce risk.
We measure progress with KPIs, protect data with secure processes, and pilot work before broader waves. That approach delivers core benefits: agility, cost control, and resilience while addressing common challenges through best practices.
Choose per-workload strategies—shift, replatforming, or refactoring—guided by performance targets, cost models, and compliance needs. Leverage AWS Migration Hub, Azure Migrate, or Google Storage Transfer Service where they fit.
Start with a readiness workshop, run a short pilot, then scale with a trusted service provider as partner. We learn each step, cut costs, and keep customers safe as systems move forward.
Cloud migration means moving IT assets, data, and workloads from local data centers into hosted environments offered by providers such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud, driven by goals like scalability, faster innovation, lower operational burden, and improved performance while enabling operating-expense models and rapid provisioning.
We recommend setting clear business goals and KPIs—OPEX targets, total cost of ownership, performance SLAs, migration duration, and allowable cutover cost—then aligning those with a prioritized asset inventory and compliance needs so every phase measures against agreed outcomes.
A full inventory lists servers, storage, networking gear, software versions and licenses, databases, middleware, integrations, data stores, and interdependencies, plus configuration and performance baselines that inform risk, sequencing, and target architecture choices.
Evaluate providers on compliance coverage, SLA commitments, available services, regional presence, integration with existing tooling, and cost models; run proof-of-concept tests for critical workloads and use cost modeling to compare long-term TCO across providers.
Base the decision on regulatory constraints, latency needs, failure tolerance, vendor lock-in risk, and team expertise—hybrid suits phased moves and sensitive data, multi-cloud supports redundancy and negotiation leverage, and single provider simplifies operations and managed services.
Rehosting (lift-and-shift) moves workloads with minimal change for speed; replatforming adjusts components to use cloud services for efficiency; refactoring rewrites apps for cloud-native scalability and cost savings; replacing swaps legacy systems for SaaS or managed PaaS when that yields faster business value.
Choose refactoring when long-term scale, agility, and cost-efficiency justify development effort—typically for strategic apps with high traffic or frequent change—where cloud-native patterns like microservices and serverless deliver measurable operational advantages.
Common patterns include physical-to-virtual (P2V), physical-to-cloud (P2C), virtual-to-virtual (V2V), and virtual-to-cloud (V2C); each affects planning for drivers such as downtime tolerance, conversion effort, and tooling compatibility.
Assign a migration architect and an executive sponsor, form a cross-functional governance board for risk, security, and compliance decisions, and define clear roles for network, security, application, and data owners to keep timelines and quality on track.
Evaluate each workload for replacement risk, cost savings potential, and complexity: use shallow integration for lift-and-shift or legacy systems needing quick retirement, and deep integration where managed services, autoscaling, or refactoring provide operational or cost benefits.
Consider public clouds for elasticity and managed services, private clouds for sensitive data and predictable workloads, hybrid for phased transitions and data residency, and multi-cloud for resilience and avoidance of single-vendor dependence.
Capture current metrics—CPU, memory, I/O, latency, throughput, and peak usage—then define success criteria for response times, error rates, availability, and cost per unit of work to validate improvements after migration.
A comprehensive plan covers data replication and cutover strategy, compute and networking mapping, security and identity configuration, compliance checkpoints, rollback procedures, testing scripts, timeline, resource assignments, and contingency budgets.
Start with low-criticality workloads to validate tooling, processes, and performance, then progressively move dependent services in phases with defined test gates, rollback plans, and stakeholder sign-offs before full production cutover.
Post-move activities include rightsizing instances, enabling autoscaling and reserved capacity where appropriate, cost tagging and monitoring, performance tuning, reliability testing, and continuous cloud-native improvements for efficiency.
AWS offers Migration Hub, Server Migration Service, and CloudEndure; Microsoft provides Azure Migrate for discovery and assessment; Google Cloud includes Storage Transfer Service for large-scale data moves—each integrates discovery, tracking, and automation features to reduce risk.
Build TCO models that include compute, storage, networking, licensing, operations, and expected scale, account for variable usage and spikes, and compare reserved and on-demand pricing to decide on right-sizing and commitment levels that lower long-term spend.
Implement usage alerts, budget caps, automated scaling rules, tagging for chargeback, and governance policies that limit costly services; use reserved instances or committed use discounts for predictable workloads to stabilize costs.
Define provider versus customer duties, enforce strong identity and access management, encrypt data at rest and in transit, maintain backups and disaster recovery, and perform regular audits and vulnerability scans to reduce risk and ensure compliance.
Map regulations to controls, choose provider services certified for the required standards, implement logging, encryption, data residency controls, and audit trails, and engage compliance teams early to document evidence for regulators and auditors.
Key risks include data loss, downtime, cost overruns, and security gaps; mitigate with staged pilots, robust backups and rollback plans, continuous monitoring, strong governance, vendor SLA review, and thorough testing before cutover.